The VIVO image collection
Two existing before-and-after pairs are labelled Aqualyx on VIVO's source website. Their original photographs and existing labels are preserved for internal review. We do not reshape bodies, retouch the treatment result, invent a number of sessions or attach a Leeds location to an image without supporting evidence.
The owner has confirmed patient permissions and treatment records for both pairs. Patient-result photographs are not published on this website. The absence of uploaded photographs does not mean a substitute result should be generated or a stock image should be presented as a patient.
Evidence: VIVO Body Studio — Before & After
Read a photograph and its caption together
Look first for the information needed to interpret the pair: the treatment actually performed, the body area, the timing of each photograph and any other relevant treatment. If that information is absent, keep the conclusion narrow. You can see a difference in the images, but you cannot reliably assign its cause, speed or likelihood for someone else.
Compare posture, camera position, distance, lighting and clothing. A person turning slightly or holding their body differently can make comparison difficult. Differently framed photographs should not be forced into an overlay that implies a precision they do not have.
Your starting point is part of the outcome
Use examples to explain a question, not to select a guaranteed result. The consultation should establish what you want to change, what is being assessed and which parts of the concern the proposed procedure is unlikely to address. Someone else's photograph cannot answer those questions for you.
It helps to agree what a worthwhile improvement would mean in your own words. That might be a specific contour concern, rather than a scale weight or a whole clothing size. Ask how the plan will be reviewed and what happens if the observed change is smaller than you hoped.
A study result is not a personal forecast
Published research can inform a clinical discussion, but the product, body area, participants and follow-up all matter. For example, the cited inner-knee Aqualyx study involved seven women. Its small size and different treatment site limit what it can establish for a Leeds visitor considering another area.
We do not turn a research percentage, a selected marketing photograph or a testimonial about another VIVO treatment into a success rate for Aqualyx Leeds. Ask which evidence supports your proposed plan and where the uncertainty remains.
Evidence: Mlosek et al. (2020) — ultrasound-guided injection lipolysis of inner-knee fat
Agree how your progress would be reviewed
If you proceed, ask what baseline record is useful, when follow-up should take place and who will assess any concerns. If clinical photographs are taken, request an explanation of storage, access and retention. Marketing consent is a separate choice; choosing not to appear on a website should not be confused with deciding whether to have treatment.
The timeline and course guides help you prepare for that conversation. BOOK NOW opens the Leeds Body service; WhatsApp offers general appointment support. Neither action guarantees treatment or an outcome, and this website does not accept uploads of private clinical photographs.
Your questions, answered
Are the editorial photographs on this website results?
No. They are labelled VIVO editorial imagery. They are not used as before-and-after evidence or presented as photographs of the Leeds practitioner or premises.
How many sessions produced the two source pairs?
No verified session count is assigned here. That information must come from the corresponding treatment record, not an assumption based on the appearance of a photograph.
Does a before-and-after picture guarantee the same change for me?
No. Your suitability, proposed procedure and expectations need individual assessment. Photographs are examples, not outcome guarantees.
Sources & editorial review
VIVO Body Studio editorial team. Updated 26 October 2026. VIVO’s owner confirms review by the Leeds practitioner. This is an owner-reported review, not an independent clinical certification. Published evidence and individual treatment advice are distinguished below.
- VIVO Body Studio — Before & After ↗
Source for the two Aqualyx-labelled pairs. Their presence here is not evidence of patient-specific permission, session count, timing or Leeds attribution.
- Mlosek et al. (2020) — ultrasound-guided injection lipolysis of inner-knee fat ↗
Small study of seven women, at a different anatomical site. Historical research, not the current Leeds protocol; no study photographs or outcome percentages reproduced.

